[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CA+55aFxfeXWAiXV18qGgOk9+2HHiD7LUuyk55brHFXd+_c6eZQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 31 Jan 2013 11:26:53 +1100
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Russell King <rmk@....linux.org.uk>
Cc: Dave Airlie <airlied@...il.com>,
Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@...ll.ch>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Florian Tobias Schandinat <FlorianSchandinat@....de>,
"linux-fbdev@...r.kernel.org" <linux-fbdev@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
dri-devel <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>
Subject: Re: BUG: circular locking dependency detected
On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 11:13 AM, Russell King <rmk@....linux.org.uk> wrote:
>
> Which may or may not be a good thing depending how you look at it; it
> means that once your kernel blanks, you get a lockdep dump. At that
> point you lose lockdep checking for everything else because lockdep
> disables itself after the first dump.
Fair enough, we may want to revert the lockdep checking for
console_lock, and make re-enabling it part of the patch-series that
fixes the locking.
Daniel/Dave? Does that sound reasonable?
Linus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists