[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1730121.raxo9SGZyf@vostro.rjw.lan>
Date: Thu, 31 Jan 2013 23:23:54 +0100
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
To: Fabio Baltieri <fabio.baltieri@...aro.org>,
Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>,
Shawn Guo <shawn.guo@...aro.org>
Cc: cpufreq@...r.kernel.org, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linaro-dev@...ts.linaro.org,
robin.randhawa@....com, Steve.Bannister@....com,
Liviu.Dudau@....com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] cpufreq: governors: Remove code redundancy between governors
On Thursday, January 31, 2013 07:50:04 PM Fabio Baltieri wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 10:58:02PM +0530, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> > With the inclusion of following patches:
> >
> > 9f4eb10 cpufreq: conservative: call dbs_check_cpu only when necessary
> > 772b4b1 cpufreq: ondemand: call dbs_check_cpu only when necessary
> >
> > code redundancy is introduced again. Get rid of it.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
> > ---
>
> Hi,
>
> Tested-by: Fabio Baltieri <fabio.baltieri@...aro.org>
OK
Fabio, Viresh, Shawn,
This time I was *really* confused as to what patches I was supposed to take,
from whom and in what order, so I applied a number of them in the order given
by patchwork. That worked well enough, because (almost) all of them applied
for me without conflicts. That said I would appreciate it if you could look
into the bleeding-edge branch of my tree and see if there's anything missing
or something that shouldn't be there (cpufreq-wise).
Thanks,
Rafael
--
I speak only for myself.
Rafael J. Wysocki, Intel Open Source Technology Center.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists