linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/2] cpufreq: governors: Remove code redundancy between governors

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20130131225114.GA6433@balto.lan>
Date:	Thu, 31 Jan 2013 23:51:14 +0100
From:	Fabio Baltieri <fabio.baltieri@...aro.org>
To:	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
Cc:	Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>,
	Shawn Guo <shawn.guo@...aro.org>, cpufreq@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-pm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linaro-dev@...ts.linaro.org, robin.randhawa@....com,
	Steve.Bannister@....com, Liviu.Dudau@....com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] cpufreq: governors: Remove code redundancy between
 governors

Hello Rafael,

On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 11:23:54PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Thursday, January 31, 2013 07:50:04 PM Fabio Baltieri wrote:
> > On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 10:58:02PM +0530, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> > > With the inclusion of following patches:
> > > 
> > > 9f4eb10 cpufreq: conservative: call dbs_check_cpu only when necessary
> > > 772b4b1 cpufreq: ondemand: call dbs_check_cpu only when necessary
> > > 
> > > code redundancy is introduced again. Get rid of it.
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
> > > ---
> > 
> > Hi,
> > 
> > Tested-by: Fabio Baltieri <fabio.baltieri@...aro.org>
> 
> OK
> 
> Fabio, Viresh, Shawn,
> 
> This time I was *really* confused as to what patches I was supposed to take,
> from whom and in what order, so I applied a number of them in the order given
> by patchwork.  That worked well enough, because (almost) all of them applied
> for me without conflicts.  That said I would appreciate it if you could look
> into the bleeding-edge branch of my tree and see if there's anything missing
> or something that shouldn't be there (cpufreq-wise).

Sorry for the confusion, your current bleeding-edge branch (eed52da)
looks good to me.  I also did a quick build and run and it works fine on
my setup.

Many thanks,
Fabio

-- 
Fabio Baltieri
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/