[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-id: <0b0001ce0002$12ecda90$38c68fb0$@samsung.com>
Date: Thu, 31 Jan 2013 14:26:51 -0800
From: Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@...sung.com>
To: 'Tomasz Figa' <tomasz.figa@...il.com>,
'Vivek Gautam' <gautam.vivek@...sung.com>
Cc: linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree-discuss@...ts.ozlabs.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-usb@...r.kernel.org, grant.likely@...retlab.ca,
dianders@...omium.org, jg1.han@...sung.com
Subject: RE: [PATCH v4 2/4] ARM: Exynos5250: Enabling ohci-exynos driver
Tomasz Figa wrote:
>
> Hi Vivek,
[...]
> > + usb@...20000 {
> > + compatible = "samsung,exynos4210-ohci";
> > + reg = <0x12120000 0x100>;
> > + interrupts = <0 71 0>;
>
> For Samsung platforms we decided per board enabling of nodes and so this
> node should also contain:
>
> status = "disabled";
>
> while in dts file of board using ohci there would be an overriding entry:
>
> usb@...20000 {
> status = "okay";
> };
>
> I know that Exynos5250 has not been yet converted into this convention,
> but using it when adding new devices will simplify the process.
>
Well, I have another opinion on this...
Let's see, yeah, we are using following method in EXYNOS4 DT...
- disabling IPs in SoC DT source and enabling IPs in board DT source
But as I said, in EXYNOS5440 DT, I want to use following, because most of
them should be enabled/used.
- enabling IPs in SoC DT source and no need enabling in board DT source.
I mean, it depends on each SoC's situation.
Thanks.
- Kukjin
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists