lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAKohpomxi91kXR+th2BbruKigmLPmrDQf1s_Mf11C3Bs53aB3A@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Fri, 1 Feb 2013 13:32:47 +0530
From:	Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
To:	Santosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar@...com>
Cc:	linaro-dev@...ts.linaro.org, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, cpufreq@...r.kernel.org, rjw@...k.pl,
	Steve.Bannister@....com, Stephen Warren <swarren@...dia.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] cpufreq: Remove unnecessary use of policy->shared_type

On 1 February 2013 13:03, Santosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar@...com> wrote:
> I am not talking about just notifiers. This is for external users who
> has subscribed for notifiers. The point is whether the core CPUFReq
> gets updated without that flag for all affected CPU.

Yes, its safe. Follow this thread, yesterday i explained this to Tomasz Figa:

http://www.spinics.net/lists/arm-kernel/msg221629.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ