linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 3/3] cpufreq: Remove unnecessary use of policy->shared

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <510B8237.7030605@ti.com>
Date:	Fri, 1 Feb 2013 14:22:07 +0530
From:	Santosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar@...com>
To:	Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
CC:	<linaro-dev@...ts.linaro.org>, <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
	<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <cpufreq@...r.kernel.org>,
	<rjw@...k.pl>, <Steve.Bannister@....com>,
	Stephen Warren <swarren@...dia.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] cpufreq: Remove unnecessary use of policy->shared_type

On Friday 01 February 2013 01:32 PM, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> On 1 February 2013 13:03, Santosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar@...com> wrote:
>> I am not talking about just notifiers. This is for external users who
>> has subscribed for notifiers. The point is whether the core CPUFReq
>> gets updated without that flag for all affected CPU.
>
> Yes, its safe. Follow this thread, yesterday i explained this to Tomasz Figa:
>
> http://www.spinics.net/lists/arm-kernel/msg221629.html
>
That part was very clear to me Viresh. Anyway thanks for the link.
 From what I read so far, it might just work but I would want to
try it out before acking the approach.

Regards,
Santosh



--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/