[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130203130731.GA2677@polaris.bitmath.org>
Date: Sun, 3 Feb 2013 14:07:31 +0100
From: "Henrik Rydberg" <rydberg@...omail.se>
To: Benjamin Tissoires <benjamin.tissoires@...il.com>
Cc: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>,
Jiri Kosina <jkosina@...e.cz>,
Stephane Chatty <chatty@...c.fr>, linux-input@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/9] Support of Nexio 42" and new default class for
hid-multitouch
Hi Benjamin,
> so, this is the v2 of the support of win7/8 devices.
Looks like it is getting there, thanks.
> changes since v1:
> - removed the "optimization" patches, as the benefit was minimum
> - introduce a new callback "report" in hid-core that drivers can use to treat the
> report by having it entirely parsed
> - rely on this new hook to support Nexio 42"
As noted in the patches comments, using raw_event() seems sufficient.
> side notes:
> - I've tested removing the heavy call to kzalloc in hid_input_field. The results
> are disapointing -> the processing time remains the same.
> - I've also tested not to rely on .event hook in hid-multitouch but only on .report.
> Idem, I thought it would reduce the code of hid-multitouch and will enhance its
> processing time, but the results are a roughly same number of lines for hid-multitouch
> and the same processing time... :(
> - these 2 tests helped in cleaning the patch set from the last time.
>
> And again, finally, I've pass all the 40 regression tests of my db. \o/
Nice. :-)
Thanks,
Henrik
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists