[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130204171128.GL27963@mtj.dyndns.org>
Date: Mon, 4 Feb 2013 09:11:28 -0800
From: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
To: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@...ldses.org>
Cc: akpm@...ux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
rusty@...tcorp.com.au, skinsbursky@...allels.com,
ebiederm@...ssion.com, jmorris@...ei.org, axboe@...nel.dk
Subject: Re: [PATCHSET] idr: implement idr_alloc() and convert existing users
On Mon, Feb 04, 2013 at 09:10:31AM -0800, Tejun Heo wrote:
> Yeah, that should be easily convertable to the new interface. How
> should we route these changes? Your patch can go through the usual
> nfs channel and the conversion and deprecation patches can be held off
> until after -rc1. Does that sound okay?
Ooh, BTW, the cyclic allocation is broken. It's prone to -ENOSPC
after the first wraparound. There are several cyclic users in the
kernel and I think it probably would be best to implement cyclic
support in idr.
Thanks.
--
tejun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists