[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAOh2x=kwADoQTv4jA9gcrVUyCP5HvA4FyZp7kfpB8nptgs+8UA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 5 Feb 2013 13:41:59 +0530
From: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
To: Nathan Zimmer <nzimmer@....com>
Cc: rjw@...k.pl, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-pm@...r.kernel.org, cpufreq@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] cpufreq: Convert the cpufreq_driver_lock to a rwlock
On Tue, Feb 5, 2013 at 4:15 AM, Nathan Zimmer <nzimmer@....com> wrote:
> This completely eliminates the contention I am seeing in __cpufreq_cpu_get.
> It also nicely stages the lock to be replaced by the rcu.
>
> CC: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
> Signed-off-by: Nathan Zimmer <nzimmer@....com>
> ---
> drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c | 44 ++++++++++++++++++++++----------------------
> 1 file changed, 22 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-)
You have rebased it against an old version of this file. Please rebase it on
latest Rafael's linux-next branch.
The patch looks good otherwise.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists