[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <2765418.Ft0GYkgNgL@vostro.rjw.lan>
Date: Tue, 05 Feb 2013 02:07:18 +0100
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
To: Nathan Zimmer <nzimmer@....com>,
Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
cpufreq@...r.kernel.org, Shawn Guo <shawn.guo@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] cpufreq: cpufreq_driver_lock is hot on large systems
On Monday, February 04, 2013 04:45:11 PM Nathan Zimmer wrote:
> I am noticing the cpufreq_driver_lock is quite hot.
> On an idle 512 system perf shows me most of the system time is spent on this
> lock. This is quite signifigant as top shows 5% of time in system time.
> My solution was to first convert the lock to a rwlock and then to the rcu.
>
>
> Nathan Zimmer (2):
> cpufreq: Convert the cpufreq_driver_lock to a rwlock
> cpufreq: Convert the cpufreq_driver_lock to use the rcu
>
> drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c | 139 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------------
> 1 file changed, 79 insertions(+), 60 deletions(-)
I like these changes.
Viresh, anyone, any comments?
Rafael
--
I speak only for myself.
Rafael J. Wysocki, Intel Open Source Technology Center.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists