linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] rwsem: steal writing sem for better performance

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 5 Feb 2013 15:58:54 +0100
From:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
To:	Alex Shi <alex.shi@...el.com>
Cc:	torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, paul.gortmaker@...driver.com,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] rwsem: steal writing sem for better performance


* Alex Shi <alex.shi@...el.com> wrote:

> Commit 5a50508 change to rwsem from mutex, that cause aim7 fork_test
> dropped 50%. Yuanhan liu does a good analysis, find it caused by
> strict sequential writing. Ingo suggest stealing sem writing from
> front task in waiting queue. https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/1/29/84
> So has this patch.
> 
> In this patch, I just allow writing steal happen when the 
> first waiter is also writer. Then the performance fully 
> recovered.

All the aim7 fork_test performance regression is recovered?

Thanks,

	Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/