linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 01/11] PINCTRL: lantiq: pinconf uses port instead of pin

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CACRpkdZxXVAGMJmjVzj4ck7VRiLTvdp9gqASdqkd_yNwEJAJXw@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Tue, 5 Feb 2013 15:59:42 +0100
From:	Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
To:	John Crispin <blogic@...nwrt.org>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/11] PINCTRL: lantiq: pinconf uses port instead of pin

On Tue, Feb 5, 2013 at 3:39 PM, Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org> wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 1, 2013 at 1:04 PM, John Crispin <blogic@...nwrt.org> wrote:
>
>> The XWAY pinctrl driver invalidly uses the port and not the pin number to work
>> out the registeres and bits to be set for the opendrain and pullup/down
>> resistors.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: John Crispin <blogic@...nwrt.org>
>
> Applied for fixes.

Actually after looking at this I start to wonder.

Is the current kernel actually enabling the Lantiq pinctrl
driver or is it not *actually* causing any regressions?

Can I just move all these fixes over to the devel
branch?

Yours,
Linus Walleij
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/