[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <51122730.5030801@ti.com>
Date: Wed, 6 Feb 2013 11:49:36 +0200
From: Roger Quadros <rogerq@...com>
To: Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>
CC: Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>, <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
<sameo@...ux.intel.com>, <balbi@...com>,
<stern@...land.harvard.edu>, <eballetbo@...il.com>,
<javier@...hile0.org>, <sshtylyov@...sta.com>,
<linux-usb@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"ABRAHAM, KISHON VIJAY" <kishon@...com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 00/30] USB: omap-ehci: Move PHY management to PHY driver
On 02/05/2013 07:17 PM, Tony Lindgren wrote:
> * Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org> [130205 09:00]:
>> On Tue, Feb 05, 2013 at 01:28:51PM +0200, Roger Quadros wrote:
>>> Hi Tony & Greg,
>>>
>>> What's the best way to get these patches in?
>>>
>>> All patches have been acked by respective maintainers.
>>>
>>> If Tony can Ack the arch/arm/mach-omap2 stuff then should I send a
>>> pull request directly to Greg? or the other way round?
>>>
>>> Tony,
>>> fyi, these patches should not interfere with the dw3c/musb stuff
>>> sent by Felipe & Kishon.
>>
>> I'm fine with Tony just taking them all if he wants to.
>
> OK. Roger, can you please do me a pull request with these
> against v3.8-rc6?
>
Tony,
Since this depends on [1] and [2] which are both in linux-next, should
I base it on linux-next?
Another option is to defer this to 3.10 merge window, along with the
DT adaptation for OMAP USB Host.
cheers,
-roger
[1] [PATCH v9 00/20] OMAP USB Host cleanup
https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/1/23/155
[2] [PATCH v2 0/6] USB: Add support for multiple PHYs of same type
https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/1/24/876
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists