[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <51122602.7060307@imgtec.com>
Date: Wed, 6 Feb 2013 09:44:34 +0000
From: James Hogan <james.hogan@...tec.com>
To: Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>
CC: Stephen Warren <swarren@...dotorg.org>,
linux-next <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Pekka Enberg <penberg@...nel.org>,
Matt Mackall <mpm@...enic.com>, <linux-mm@...ck.org>
Subject: Re: next-20130204 - bisected slab problem to "slab: Common constants
for kmalloc boundaries"
On 05/02/13 18:34, Christoph Lameter wrote:
> On Tue, 5 Feb 2013, James Hogan wrote:
>
>> On 05/02/13 16:36, Christoph Lameter wrote:
>>> OK I was able to reproduce it by setting ARCH_DMA_MINALIGN in slab.h. This
>>> patch fixes it here:
>>>
>>>
>>> Subject: slab: Handle ARCH_DMA_MINALIGN correctly
>>>
>>> A fixed KMALLOC_SHIFT_LOW does not work for arches with higher alignment
>>> requirements.
>>>
>>> Determine KMALLOC_SHIFT_LOW from ARCH_DMA_MINALIGN instead.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>
>>
>> Thanks, your patch fixes it for me.
>
> Ok I guess that implies a Tested-by:
>
Yep sorry, feel free to add my Tested-by: if you roll this as a separate
patch.
Cheers
James
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists