[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAOh2x=nYOf32jKqwwikgBS2oRHwmhZdVug=pLzQZWp-N2S9CGw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 6 Feb 2013 07:15:47 +0530
From: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
To: dirk.brandewie@...il.com
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, cpufreq@...r.kernel.org,
Dirk Brandewie <dirk.j.brandewie@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/7] cpufreq: Retrieve current frequency from scaling
drivers with internal governors
On Tue, Feb 5, 2013 at 11:54 PM, <dirk.brandewie@...il.com> wrote:
> diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
> index 2817c3c..96bc302 100644
> --- a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
> +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
> @@ -1181,6 +1181,13 @@ unsigned int cpufreq_quick_get(unsigned int cpu)
> struct cpufreq_policy *policy = cpufreq_cpu_get(cpu);
> unsigned int ret_freq = 0;
>
> + if (cpufreq_driver && cpufreq_driver->setpolicy &&
> + cpufreq_driver->get) {
> + ret_freq = cpufreq_driver->get(cpu);
> + cpufreq_cpu_put(policy);
> + return ret_freq;
> + }
> +
This was my comment on the last version:
"You are required to do cpufreq_cpu_put() in this case too... Better do
cpufreq_cpu_get() after your check."
It still applies.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists