linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] clk: tegra: Add missing spinlock for hclk and pclk

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 07 Feb 2013 09:49:06 -0800
From:	Mike Turquette <mturquette@...aro.org>
To:	Peter De Schrijver <pdeschrijver@...dia.com>,
	<pdeschrijver@...dia.com>
Cc:	Stephen Warren <swarren@...dia.com>,
	Prashant Gaikwad <pgaikwad@...dia.com>,
	Joseph Lo <josephl@...dia.com>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] clk: tegra: Add missing spinlock for hclk and pclk

Quoting Peter De Schrijver (2013-02-07 08:37:35)
> The hclk and pclk clocks are controlled by the same register. Hence a lock is
> required to avoid corruption.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Peter De Schrijver <pdeschrijver@...dia.com>

I assume this is going through the tegra tree with the other ccf
patches, so:

Acked-by: Mike Turquette <mturquette@...aro.org>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/