[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5113FCF8.1060402@wwwdotorg.org>
Date: Thu, 07 Feb 2013 12:14:00 -0700
From: Stephen Warren <swarren@...dotorg.org>
To: Mike Turquette <mturquette@...aro.org>
CC: Peter De Schrijver <pdeschrijver@...dia.com>,
Stephen Warren <swarren@...dia.com>,
Prashant Gaikwad <pgaikwad@...dia.com>,
Joseph Lo <josephl@...dia.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] clk: tegra: Add missing spinlock for hclk and pclk
On 02/07/2013 10:49 AM, Mike Turquette wrote:
> Quoting Peter De Schrijver (2013-02-07 08:37:35)
>> The hclk and pclk clocks are controlled by the same register. Hence a lock is
>> required to avoid corruption.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Peter De Schrijver <pdeschrijver@...dia.com>
>
> I assume this is going through the tegra tree with the other ccf
> patches, so:
>
> Acked-by: Mike Turquette <mturquette@...aro.org>
I've applied this to Tegra's for-3.9/soc-ccf-fixes branch.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists