[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAJd=RBBvE-5f1UyJGu32EHGVCXe6rVYY0010SKa56j7OvtPG7g@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 8 Feb 2013 11:42:43 +0800
From: Hillf Danton <dhillf@...il.com>
To: Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>, Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, Hillf Danton <dhillf@...il.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 2/2] stop_machine: dequeue work before signal completion
As checked with BUG_ON in the case of CPU_UP_PREPARE, we have to dequeue
work first for further actions, then stopper reaches sane and clear state.
Signed-off-by: Hillf Danton <dhillf@...il.com>
---
--- a/kernel/stop_machine.c Fri Feb 8 11:22:44 2013
+++ b/kernel/stop_machine.c Fri Feb 8 11:29:40 2013
@@ -342,8 +342,12 @@ static int __cpuinit cpu_stop_cpu_callba
kthread_stop(stopper->thread);
/* drain remaining works */
spin_lock_irq(&stopper->lock);
- list_for_each_entry(work, &stopper->works, list)
+ while (!list_empty(&stopper->works)) {
+ work = list_first_entry(&stopper->works,
+ struct cpu_stop_work, list);
+ list_del_init(&work->list);
cpu_stop_signal_done(work->done, false);
+ }
stopper->enabled = false;
spin_unlock_irq(&stopper->lock);
/* release the stopper */
--
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists