[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87pq0bqkod.fsf@sejong.aot.lge.com>
Date: Fri, 08 Feb 2013 17:22:42 +0900
From: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>
To: Hillf Danton <dhillf@...il.com>
Cc: Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>, Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] stop_machine: dequeue work before signal completion
On Fri, 8 Feb 2013 11:42:43 +0800, Hillf Danton wrote:
> As checked with BUG_ON in the case of CPU_UP_PREPARE, we have to dequeue
> work first for further actions, then stopper reaches sane and clear state.
Reviewed-by: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>
Thanks,
Namhyung
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists