linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/2] stop_machine: dequeue work before signal completion

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAJd=RBAgNdXZjcKpJJLwrUUuUpD9Mqmi44etf3HJoA8Xr0iXeQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Fri, 8 Feb 2013 20:03:06 +0800
From:	Hillf Danton <dhillf@...il.com>
To:	Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>
Cc:	Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>, Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] stop_machine: dequeue work before signal completion

Hello Namhyung

On Fri, Feb 8, 2013 at 4:22 PM, Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org> wrote:
> On Fri, 8 Feb 2013 11:42:43 +0800, Hillf Danton wrote:
>> As checked with BUG_ON in the case of CPU_UP_PREPARE, we have to dequeue
>> work first for further actions, then stopper reaches sane and clear state.
>
> Reviewed-by: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>
>
Double thanks since I did not add you in the cc list, may bad;(

Hillf
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/