[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130211140704.GI4503@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2013 14:07:05 +0000
From: Al Viro <viro@...IV.linux.org.uk>
To: Jonas Bonn <jonas.bonn@...il.com>
Cc: Vineet Gupta <Vineet.Gupta1@...opsys.com>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
"linux-arch@...r.kernel.org" <linux-arch@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: pt_regs leak into userspace (was Re: [PATCH v3 20/71] ARC:
Signal handling)
On Mon, Feb 11, 2013 at 11:30:50AM +0100, Jonas Bonn wrote:
> >> Is this really true? Don't setcontext and friends require that _all_
> >> the registers be part of sigcontext?
> >
> > But for an ABI - callee saved regs will anyhow be saved/restored even in
> > setcontext case ! So collecting it for that purpose seems useless, or am I missing
> > something here.
>
> Yes, I agree with you on the ABI bit... but set/get/swapcontext are
> special in that they use rt_sigreturn to "trick" the kernel into
> swapping out _all_ registers; it's a light-weight (userspace) context
> switch.
>
> (I really don't know this area very well, though, so I'm hoping
> somebody more knowledgable jumps in here... Al?)
I'd suggest asking itanic folks; they do *not* put callee-saved stuff into
sigcontext. AFAICS, they don't have setcontext() implemented as a syscall
at all - it's done as sigprocmask() + doing to callee-saved registers what
longjmp() does.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists