lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1360663879.4485.2.camel@laptop>
Date:	Tue, 12 Feb 2013 11:11:19 +0100
From:	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To:	Alex Shi <alex.shi@...el.com>
Cc:	torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, mingo@...hat.com,
	tglx@...utronix.de, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
	arjan@...ux.intel.com, bp@...en8.de, pjt@...gle.com,
	namhyung@...nel.org, efault@....de, vincent.guittot@...aro.org,
	gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, preeti@...ux.vnet.ibm.com,
	viresh.kumar@...aro.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [patch v4 01/18] sched: set SD_PREFER_SIBLING on MC domain to
 reduce a domain level

On Thu, 2013-01-24 at 11:06 +0800, Alex Shi wrote:
> The domain flag SD_PREFER_SIBLING was set both on MC and CPU domain at
> frist commit b5d978e0c7e79a, and was removed uncarefully when clear up
> obsolete power scheduler. Then commit 6956dc568 recover the flag on CPU
> domain only. It works, but it introduces a extra domain level since this
> cause MC/CPU different.
> 
> So, recover the the flag in MC domain too to remove a domain level in
> x86 platform.

This fails to clearly state why its desirable.. I'm guessing its because
we should use sibling cache domains before sibling threads, right?

A clearly stated reason is always preferable over: it was this way, make
it so again; which leaves us wondering why. 

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ