[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1360663879.4485.2.camel@laptop>
Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2013 11:11:19 +0100
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Alex Shi <alex.shi@...el.com>
Cc: torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, mingo@...hat.com,
tglx@...utronix.de, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
arjan@...ux.intel.com, bp@...en8.de, pjt@...gle.com,
namhyung@...nel.org, efault@....de, vincent.guittot@...aro.org,
gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, preeti@...ux.vnet.ibm.com,
viresh.kumar@...aro.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [patch v4 01/18] sched: set SD_PREFER_SIBLING on MC domain to
reduce a domain level
On Thu, 2013-01-24 at 11:06 +0800, Alex Shi wrote:
> The domain flag SD_PREFER_SIBLING was set both on MC and CPU domain at
> frist commit b5d978e0c7e79a, and was removed uncarefully when clear up
> obsolete power scheduler. Then commit 6956dc568 recover the flag on CPU
> domain only. It works, but it introduces a extra domain level since this
> cause MC/CPU different.
>
> So, recover the the flag in MC domain too to remove a domain level in
> x86 platform.
This fails to clearly state why its desirable.. I'm guessing its because
we should use sibling cache domains before sibling threads, right?
A clearly stated reason is always preferable over: it was this way, make
it so again; which leaves us wondering why.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists