linux-kernel - Re: [patch v4 02/18] sched: select_task_rq

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1360664089.4485.6.camel@laptop>
Date:	Tue, 12 Feb 2013 11:14:49 +0100
From:	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To:	Alex Shi <alex.shi@...el.com>
Cc:	torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, mingo@...hat.com,
	tglx@...utronix.de, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
	arjan@...ux.intel.com, bp@...en8.de, pjt@...gle.com,
	namhyung@...nel.org, efault@....de, vincent.guittot@...aro.org,
	gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, preeti@...ux.vnet.ibm.com,
	viresh.kumar@...aro.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [patch v4 02/18] sched: select_task_rq_fair clean up

On Thu, 2013-01-24 at 11:06 +0800, Alex Shi wrote:
> It is impossible to miss a task allowed cpu in a eligible group.

I suppose your reasoning goes like: tsk->cpus_allowed is protected by
->pi_lock, we hold this, therefore it cannot change and
find_idlest_group() dtrt?

We can then state that this is due to adding proper serialization to
tsk->cpus_allowed.

> And since find_idlest_group only return a different group which
> excludes old cpu, it's also impossible to find a new cpu same as old
> cpu.

Sounds plausible, but I'm not convinced, do we have hard serialization
against hotplug?



--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/