[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CABPqkBQBnN8y7WWWye1e0goJ6On1SYOKWsUG9=R76+d7ScWLDg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2013 18:33:42 +0100
From: Stephane Eranian <eranian@...gle.com>
To: Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
"mingo@...e.hu" <mingo@...e.hu>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...hat.com>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung.kim@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] perf stat: add per-core count aggregation
On Tue, Feb 12, 2013 at 6:29 PM, Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com> wrote:
>>
>> > The idea itself is useful.
>> >
>> Yes, it is.
>
> BTW it would be even more useful if it could print some of the
> statistics turbostat does (in particular frequency and C0 residency)
> Often you only care about cycles not idle, and the frequency
> tells you how fast the cycles happen.
>
You get C-state residency at the socket level with my perf uncore
patch.
This patch is just about helping with unbalance at the physical
core level.
> I think Cx could be added relatively easily as a software event,
> but frequency doesn't fit very well into the perf counting model,
> as it's really sampling.
>
> -Andi
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists