[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <874nhgps85.fsf@sejong.aot.lge.com>
Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2013 16:50:50 +0900
From: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>
To: Stephane Eranian <eranian@...gle.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, peterz@...radead.org, mingo@...e.hu,
ak@...ux.intel.com, acme@...hat.com, jolsa@...hat.com,
namhyung.kim@....com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] perf stat: refactor aggregation code
Hi Stephane,
On Tue, 12 Feb 2013 15:09:27 +0100, Stephane Eranian wrote:
> Refactor aggregation code by introducing
> a single aggr_mode variable and an enum
> for aggregation.
>
> Also refactor cpumap code having to do
> with cpu to socket mappings. All in preparation
> for extended modes, such as cpu -> core.
>
> Also fix socket aggregation and ensure
> that sockets are printed in increasing order.
[snip]
> -static void print_aggr_socket(char *prefix)
> +static void print_aggr(char *prefix)
> {
> struct perf_evsel *counter;
> + int cpu, s, s2, id, nr;
> u64 ena, run, val;
> - int cpu, s, s2, sock, nr;
>
> - if (!sock_map)
> + if (!(aggr_map || aggr_get_id))
> return;
>
> - for (s = 0; s < sock_map->nr; s++) {
> - sock = cpu_map__socket(sock_map, s);
> + for (s = 0; s < aggr_map->nr; s++) {
> + id = aggr_map->map[s];
> list_for_each_entry(counter, &evsel_list->entries, node) {
> val = ena = run = 0;
> nr = 0;
...
> @@ -1073,14 +1081,20 @@ static void print_stat(int argc, const char **argv)
> fprintf(output, ":\n\n");
> }
>
> - if (aggr_socket)
> - print_aggr_socket(NULL);
> - else if (no_aggr) {
> - list_for_each_entry(counter, &evsel_list->entries, node)
> - print_counter(counter, NULL);
> - } else {
> + switch (aggr_mode) {
> + case AGGR_SOCKET:
> + print_aggr(NULL);
> + break;
This line should look like this IMHO:
list_for_each_entry(counter, &evsel_list->entries, node)
print_aggr(counter, NULL);
and the equivalent loop in the print_aggr() should be removed. This is
for consistency with other formats if multiple events counted.
For instance, it'd sorting on events first and then sockets like:
# time socket cpus counts events
t0 S0 4 XXXXXX cycles
t0 S1 4 XXXXXX cycles
t0 S0 4 YYYY cache-misses
t0 S1 4 YYYY cache-misses
t1 S0 4 ZZZZZZ cycles
...
But current code looks like sorting on sockets first instead.
# time socket cpus counts events
t0 S0 4 XXXXXX cycles
t0 S0 4 YYYY cache-misses
t0 S1 4 XXXXXX cycles
t0 S1 4 YYYY cache-misses
t1 S0 4 ZZZZZZ cycles
...
Thanks,
Namhyung
> + case AGGR_GLOBAL:
> list_for_each_entry(counter, &evsel_list->entries, node)
> print_counter_aggr(counter, NULL);
> + break;
> + case AGGR_NONE:
> + list_for_each_entry(counter, &evsel_list->entries, node)
> + print_counter(counter, NULL);
> + break;
> + default:
> + break;
> }
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists