linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 6/6] of_spi: Initialize cs_gpios and cs

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20130212180143.F15523E0FDC@localhost>
Date:	Tue, 12 Feb 2013 18:01:43 +0000
From:	Grant Likely <grant.likely@...retlab.ca>
To:	Andreas Larsson <andreas@...sler.com>
Cc:	Rob Herring <rob.herring@...xeda.com>,
	Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
	devicetree-discuss@...ts.ozlabs.org,
	spi-devel-general@...ts.sourceforge.net,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, software@...sler.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 6/6] of_spi: Initialize cs_gpios and cs_gpio with -EEXIST

On Tue, 12 Feb 2013 10:46:27 +0100, Andreas Larsson <andreas@...sler.com> wrote:
> On 2013-02-11 01:23, Grant Likely wrote:
> > On Tue, 29 Jan 2013 15:53:43 +0100, Andreas Larsson <andreas@...sler.com> wrote:
> >> Holes in the cs-gpios DT phandle list is supposed to mark that native
> >> chipselects is to be used. The value returned from of_get_named_gpio_flags in
> >> this case is -EEXIST. By initializing cs_gpios and cs_gpio with -EEXIST, this
> >> and only this errno will indicate to a spi controller driver that a native
> >> chipselect is to be used.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Andreas Larsson <andreas@...sler.com>
> >
> > I've left this one off for now. Take a look at the patch I posted and
> > let me know if you think this one should still be applied.
> 
> I think that of_spi_register_master should return an error when the 
> cs-gpios property is broken (part of patch 2) and that cs_gpios and 
> cs_gpio should be initialized to the same value as a hole in the plist.
> 
> This patch does not work without 1 and 2, so I'll submit a modified 
> patch once "of: Create function for counting number of phandles in a 
> property" has stabilized. Would it have to go through the gpio branch then?

I'll put it through the DT branch since that is where I'll put the
of_count_phandle patch (assuming it is ready for the 3.9 merge window).

g.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/