[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CA+55aFzmWfOQzVMPJUah3oEsn-aaeN5qtO=7P3MQUfLZmEFJZA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2013 20:47:15 -0800
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Jamie Lokier <jamie@...reable.org>,
ville.syrjala@...ux.intel.com, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
linux-tip-commits@...r.kernel.org, "H.J. Lu" <hjl.tools@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [tip:x86/mm] x86, mm: Use a bitfield to mask nuisance get_user() warnings
On Mon, Feb 11, 2013 at 8:42 PM, Linus Torvalds
<torvalds@...ux-foundation.org> wrote:
>
> But I don't see anything fundamentally wrong with it. Certainly it
> looks much better than the disgusting and warning-prone
>
> unsigned long long __val_gu8
>
> thing.
Oh. I just realized. That was your _baseline_ in the comparisons, wasn't it?
Can you please make the baseline be the current mainline git version
of <asm/uaccess.h>, not the first "unsigned long long __val_gu8"
version of the 64-bit get_user()?
Because we should compare against the straightforward code, not the
one that could have messed things up already..
Linus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists