linux-kernel - Re: [tip:x86/mm] x86, mm: Use a bitfield to mask nuisance get

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 11 Feb 2013 20:51:32 -0800
From:	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
To:	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
CC:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Jamie Lokier <jamie@...reable.org>,
	ville.syrjala@...ux.intel.com, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
	Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	linux-tip-commits@...r.kernel.org, "H.J. Lu" <hjl.tools@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [tip:x86/mm] x86, mm: Use a bitfield to mask nuisance get_user()
 warnings

On 02/11/2013 08:47 PM, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 11, 2013 at 8:42 PM, Linus Torvalds
> <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org> wrote:
>>
>> But I don't see anything fundamentally wrong with it. Certainly it
>> looks much better than the disgusting and warning-prone
>>
>>      unsigned long long __val_gu8
>>
>> thing.
>
> Oh. I just realized. That was your _baseline_ in the comparisons, wasn't it?
>
> Can you please make the baseline be the current mainline git version
> of <asm/uaccess.h>, not the first "unsigned long long __val_gu8"
> version of the 64-bit get_user()?
>
> Because we should compare against the straightforward code, not the
> one that could have messed things up already..
>

No, the baseline was x86/mm before *any* of the 64-bit get_user() stuff 
were applied.

Very small differences can often be slight differences in strings (which 
end up in .rodata and thus count as text as far as size is concerned ... 
things like pathnames and dates.)  I am unclear about why the i386-pae 
build case stood out like that.

	-hpa


-- 
H. Peter Anvin, Intel Open Source Technology Center
I work for Intel.  I don't speak on their behalf.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/