lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <f6d62df8f3cb4076a2d3fe8a4f054a99@SN2PR03MB061.namprd03.prod.outlook.com>
Date:	Wed, 13 Feb 2013 03:49:18 +0000
From:	KY Srinivasan <kys@...rosoft.com>
To:	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
CC:	Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org>,
	"mingo@...nel.org" <mingo@...nel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"tglx@...utronix.de" <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	"hpa@...ux.intel.com" <hpa@...ux.intel.com>,
	"linux-tip-commits@...r.kernel.org" 
	<linux-tip-commits@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [tip:x86/hyperv] X86: Handle Hyper-V vmbus interrupts as
 special hypervisor interrupts



> -----Original Message-----
> From: H. Peter Anvin [mailto:hpa@...or.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, February 12, 2013 10:46 PM
> To: KY Srinivasan
> Cc: Yinghai Lu; mingo@...nel.org; linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org;
> tglx@...utronix.de; hpa@...ux.intel.com; linux-tip-commits@...r.kernel.org
> Subject: Re: [tip:x86/hyperv] X86: Handle Hyper-V vmbus interrupts as special
> hypervisor interrupts
> 
> On 02/12/2013 07:32 PM, KY Srinivasan wrote:
> >>>
> >>> +#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_HYPERV)
> >>> +apicinterrupt HYPERVISOR_CALLBACK_VECTOR \
> >>> +       hyperv_callback_vector hyperv_vector_handler
> >>> +#endif /* CONFIG_HYPERV */
> >>> +
> >>
> >> so #ifdef CONFIG_HYPERV does not work here?
> >
> > The issue was that you could turn on CONFIG_HYPERV without enabling
> > CONFIG_X86_LOCAL_APIC. Peter fixed it.
> >
> 
> He is asking why you are using IS_ENABLED() instead of #ifdef.  The
> difference is that IS_ENABLED() works even for modules.

My mistake!

K. Y
> 
> 	-hpa
> 
> --
> H. Peter Anvin, Intel Open Source Technology Center
> I work for Intel.  I don't speak on their behalf.
> 
> 

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ