[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <511DE524.3070901@synopsys.com>
Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2013 13:05:00 +0530
From: Vineet Gupta <Vineet.Gupta1@...opsys.com>
To: Jonas Bonn <jonas.bonn@...il.com>
CC: Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
"linux-arch@...r.kernel.org" <linux-arch@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: pt_regs leak into userspace (was Re: [PATCH v3 20/71] ARC: Signal
handling)
On Friday 15 February 2013 12:53 PM, Jonas Bonn wrote:
> On 11 February 2013 15:07, Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk> wrote:
>
>> I'd suggest asking itanic folks; they do *not* put callee-saved stuff into
>> sigcontext. AFAICS, they don't have setcontext() implemented as a syscall
>> at all - it's done as sigprocmask() + doing to callee-saved registers what
>> longjmp() does.
>
> Just to round off this discussion, after giving it some more thought I
> agree that the case where you would need callee-saved registers
> restored is probably rather pathological. Any sane use of
> get/set/swapcontext is manageable without this.
>
> So, Vineet, I'm now convinced your approach is sound. I will probably
> amend the OpenRISC arch to behave similarly. Consider your entire
> patch Acked now.
I'll add your ack to the the signal handling patch as the contention was primarily
on sigcontext bits.
Thx,
-Vineet
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists