[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAJK669ZATh8FojTGdFH_x7ovMvA2L7XFUratiptJmPFZPhv31g@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 16 Feb 2013 09:48:48 +0100
From: Sjur Brændeland <sjurbren@...il.com>
To: Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Ohad Ben-Cohen <ohad@...ery.com>,
Vikram ARV <vikram.arv@...ricsson.com>,
Dmitry TARNYAGIN <dmitry.tarnyagin@...ricsson.com>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Erwan YVIN <erwan.yvin@...ricsson.com>,
"virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org"
<virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
Ido Yariv <ido@...ery.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH vringh 2/2] caif_virtio: Introduce caif over virtio
> Sjur Brændeland <sjurbren@...il.com> writes:
>> How about supporting struct vringh_kiov and struct kvec as well?
>> I currently get the following complaints with my V2 patch-set:
>>
>> drivers/net/caif/caif_virtio.c:486:2: warning: passing argument 1 of
>> ‘vringh_iov_init’ from incompatible pointer type [enabled by default]
>
> vringh_kiov_init()? Did I miss something else?
I get a warning for my useof vringh_iov_cleanup() in
addition to the one above.
How about adding kiov variants of vringh_iov_cleanup()
and vringh_iov_reset() as well?
Thanks,
Sjur
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists