[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <A5ED84D3BB3A384992CBB9C77DEDA4D414ABE178@USINDEM103.corp.hds.com>
Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2013 23:45:58 +0000
From: Seiji Aguchi <seiji.aguchi@....com>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
CC: "x86@...nel.org" <x86@...nel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"Thomas Gleixner (tglx@...utronix.de)" <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"'mingo@...e.hu' (mingo@...e.hu)" <mingo@...e.hu>,
"Borislav Petkov (bp@...en8.de)" <bp@...en8.de>,
Satoru Moriya <satoru.moriya@....com>,
"dle-develop@...ts.sourceforge.net"
<dle-develop@...ts.sourceforge.net>,
"linux-edac@...r.kernel.org" <linux-edac@...r.kernel.org>,
"Luck, Tony (tony.luck@...el.com)" <tony.luck@...el.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v9 2/3] trace,x86: add x86 irq vector tracepoints
> > Not-yet-signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
> >
> > ... so I was holding off on doing anything with it.
>
> Heh, and I was waiting for comments from you before doing anything further with it ;-)
>
> Email review deadlock!
So, how do you plan to push ahead with this patch?
https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/2/1/532
<snip>
I think I got all the cases, as NMIs causes the store/restore functions to be re-entrent without any locks.
<snip>
Steven,
if you think you got all the cases, you can do more testing.
What is your concern?
I hope this patch will be included in 3.9.
Seiji
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists