[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130219192750.GT17414@htj.dyndns.org>
Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2013 11:27:50 -0800
From: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
To: Lai Jiangshan <eag0628@...il.com>
Cc: Lai Jiangshan <laijs@...fujitsu.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 13/15] workqueue: also record worker in work->data if
running&&queued
Hello, Lai.
On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 11:04:31PM +0800, Lai Jiangshan wrote:
> (But are patch 1, 5-8 possible merged after rebased and revised?)
0001 is problematic because it adds a hash lookup which isn't
necessary. In this series, it's okay as the later lookup is removed
eventually but without that, I don't think it's a good idea to apply
0001.
0002 looks good to me.
0005, I'm not sure what the benefit would be without later changes.
0006-0008 yeah, probably.
I'll try to apply them on top of wq/for-3.9.
Thanks.
--
tejun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists