[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CA+8MBbKuBheEj9t8whJBc=S7NdxCF8MvuD2Ajm7suP=7JC01fg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2013 13:56:55 -0800
From: Tony Luck <tony.luck@...il.com>
To: Xishi Qiu <qiuxishi@...wei.com>
Cc: Matt Fleming <matt.fleming@...el.com>, fenghua.yu@...el.com,
Liujiang <jiang.liu@...wei.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-ia64@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-efi@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
Hanjun Guo <guohanjun@...wei.com>,
WuJianguo <wujianguo@...wei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V3] ia64/mm: fix a bad_page bug when crash kernel booting
Foolishly sent an earlier reply from Outlook which appears
to have mangled/lost it. Trying again ...
> In efi_init() memory aligns in IA64_GRANULE_SIZE(16M). If set "crashkernel=1024M-:600M"
Is this where the real problem begins? Should we insist that users
provide crashkernel
parameters rounded to GRANULE boundaries?
-Tony
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists