[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130219215432.GP20312@moon>
Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2013 01:54:32 +0400
From: Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@...nvz.org>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, Michal Marek <mmarek@...e.cz>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
ebiederm@...ssion.com, xemul@...allels.com,
Andrey Vagin <avagin@...nvz.org>,
KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...il.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Glauber Costa <glommer@...allels.com>,
Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>, Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>,
Matt Helsley <matthltc@...ibm.com>,
Pekka Enberg <penberg@...nel.org>,
Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>,
Vasiliy Kulikov <segoon@...nwall.com>,
Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@...il.com>,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [patch 1/2] kcmp: Make it to depend on CONFIG_KCMP
On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 01:42:56PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > Index: linux-2.6.git/kernel/Makefile
> > ===================================================================
> > --- linux-2.6.git.orig/kernel/Makefile
> > +++ linux-2.6.git/kernel/Makefile
> > @@ -25,9 +25,7 @@ endif
> > obj-y += sched/
> > obj-y += power/
> >
> > -ifeq ($(CONFIG_CHECKPOINT_RESTORE),y)
> > -obj-$(CONFIG_X86) += kcmp.o
> > -endif
> > +obj-$(CONFIG_KCMP) += kcmp.o
> > obj-$(CONFIG_FREEZER) += freezer.o
> > obj-$(CONFIG_PROFILING) += profile.o
> > obj-$(CONFIG_STACKTRACE) += stacktrace.o
>
> This permits people to select kcmp with CONFIG_CHECKPOINT_RESTORE=n.
> Is there any point in doing that?
>
> What would be wrong with just doing
>
> obj-$(CONFIG_CHECKPOINT_RESTORE) += kcmp.o
I think this syscall is usefull even without c/r stuff.
That's why I made it with separate config option.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists