[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <27231.1361479429@ale.ozlabs.ibm.com>
Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2013 14:43:49 -0600
From: Michael Neuling <mikey@...ling.org>
To: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>
cc: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
Al Viro <viro@...IV.linux.org.uk>, linux-next@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the signal tree with the powerpc tree
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org> wrote:
> On Thu, 2013-02-21 at 15:52 +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > Hi Al,
> >
> > Today's linux-next merge of the signal tree got conflicts in
> > arch/powerpc/kernel/signal_32.c and arch/powerpc/kernel/signal_64.c
> > between commit 2b0a576d15e0 ("powerpc: Add new transactional memory state
> > to the signal context") from the powerpc tree and commit 7cce246557bf
> > ("powerpc: switch to generic sigaltstack") from the signal tree.
> >
> > I fixed it up (I think - see below) and can carry the fix as necessary
> > (no action is required).
>
> Mikey, can you check everything's all right ?
>
> I'm happy to wait for Al stuff to go in first & fixup the conflict
> before I send the pull request to Linus. I'm off travelling around but I
> should be able to get stuff out this week-end.
The merge looks fine to me. My TM signal tests still pass on
next-20130221.
Thanks sfr!
Mikey
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists