linux-kernel - Re: linux-next: manual merge of the signal tree with the powerpc tree

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20130222083023.00d9f891e4a2d9b386078d70@canb.auug.org.au>
Date:	Fri, 22 Feb 2013 08:30:23 +1100
From:	Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To:	Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>
Cc:	Michael Neuling <mikey@...ling.org>,
	Al Viro <viro@...IV.linux.org.uk>, linux-next@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
	linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the signal tree with the powerpc
 tree

Hi Ben,

On Thu, 21 Feb 2013 14:43:49 -0600 Michael Neuling <mikey@...ling.org> wrote:
>
> Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org> wrote:
> 
> > On Thu, 2013-02-21 at 15:52 +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > > 
> > > Today's linux-next merge of the signal tree got conflicts in
> > > arch/powerpc/kernel/signal_32.c and arch/powerpc/kernel/signal_64.c
> > > between commit 2b0a576d15e0 ("powerpc: Add new transactional memory state
> > > to the signal context") from the powerpc tree and commit 7cce246557bf
> > > ("powerpc: switch to generic sigaltstack") from the signal tree.
> > > 
> > > I fixed it up (I think - see below) and can carry the fix as necessary
> > > (no action is required).
> > 
> > Mikey, can you check everything's all right ?
> > 
> > I'm happy to wait for Al stuff to go in first & fixup the conflict
> > before I send the pull request to Linus. I'm off travelling around but I
> > should be able to get stuff out this week-end.
> 
> The merge looks fine to me.  My TM signal tests still pass on
> next-20130221.

I think all you (or Al) need do is mention it to Linus when you send the
pull request - he is usually smart enough to fix these things :-) and
likes to see the interactions.

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell                    sfr@...b.auug.org.au

Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped