[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <8738woriud.fsf@linaro.org>
Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2013 21:57:46 -0800
From: Kevin Hilman <khilman@...aro.org>
To: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>
Cc: Mats Liljegren <mats.liljegren@...a.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linaro-dev@...ts.linaro.org, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC/PATCH 2/5] kernel_cpustat: convert to atomic 64-bit accessors
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com> writes:
> 2013/2/21 Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>:
>> 2013/2/21 Kevin Hilman <khilman@...aro.org>:
>>> Subject: [PATCH 2/5] kernel_cpustat: convert to atomic 64-bit accessors
>>>
>>> Use the atomic64_* accessors for all the kernel_cpustat fields to
>>> ensure atomic access on non-64 bit platforms.
>>>
>>> Thanks to Mats Liljegren for CGROUP_CPUACCT related fixes.
>>>
>>> Cc: Mats Liljegren <mats.liljegren@...a.com>
>>> Signed-off-by: Kevin Hilman <khilman@...aro.org>
>>
>> Funny stuff, I thought struct kernel_cpustat was made of cputime_t
>> field. Actually it's u64. So the issue is independant from the new
>> full dynticks cputime accounting. It was already broken before.
>>
>> But yeah that's not the point, we still want to fix this anyway. But
>> let's just treat this patch as independant.
OK, I just sent an updated series based on your proposal.
Thanks for the review,
Kevin
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists