[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <51270AD9.9020908@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2013 14:06:17 +0800
From: Michael Wang <wangyun@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>
CC: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Paul Turner <pjt@...gle.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, alex.shi@...el.com,
Ram Pai <linuxram@...ibm.com>,
"Nikunj A. Dadhania" <nikunj@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v3 0/3] sched: simplify the select_task_rq_fair()
On 02/22/2013 01:08 PM, Mike Galbraith wrote:
> On Fri, 2013-02-22 at 10:37 +0800, Michael Wang wrote:
>
>> According to the testing result, I could not agree this purpose of
>> wake_affine() benefit us, but I'm sure that wake_affine() is a terrible
>> performance killer when system is busy.
>
> (hm, result is singular.. pgbench in 1:N mode only?)
I'm not sure about how pgbench implemented, all I know is it will create
several instance and access the database, I suppose no different from
several threads access database (1 server and N clients?).
There are improvement since when system busy, wake_affine() will be skipped.
And in old world, when system is busy, wake_affine() will only be
skipped if prev_cpu and curr_cpu belong to different nodes.
Regards,
Michael Wang
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists