linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/4] dcache: make Oracle more scalable on large systems

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 21 Feb 2013 16:13:45 -0800
From:	Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
To:	Dave Chinner <david@...morbit.com>
Cc:	Waiman Long <Waiman.Long@...com>, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
	Alexander Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] dcache: make Oracle more scalable on large systems

Dave Chinner <david@...morbit.com> writes:

> On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 01:50:55PM -0500, Waiman Long wrote:
>> It was found that the Oracle database software issues a lot of call
>> to the seq_path() kernel function which translates a (dentry, mnt)
>> pair to an absolute path. The seq_path() function will eventually
>> take the following two locks:
>
> Nobody should be doing reverse dentry-to-name lookups in a quantity
> sufficient for it to become a performance limiting factor. What is
> the Oracle DB actually using this path for?

Yes calling d_path frequently is usually a bug elsewhere.
Is that through /proc ? 

-Andi


-- 
ak@...ux.intel.com -- Speaking for myself only
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/