[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130222002901.GA22670@dcvr.yhbt.net>
Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2013 00:29:01 +0000
From: Eric Wong <normalperson@...t.net>
To: Jeremy Allison <jra@...ba.org>
Cc: "Myklebust, Trond" <Trond.Myklebust@...app.com>,
Ric Wheeler <rwheeler@...hat.com>,
Linux FS Devel <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"Chris L. Mason" <clmason@...ionio.com>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
Alexander Viro <aviro@...hat.com>,
"Martin K. Petersen" <mkp@....net>, Hannes Reinecke <hare@...e.de>
Subject: Re: New copyfile system call - discuss before LSF?
Jeremy Allison <jra@...ba.org> wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 21, 2013 at 01:51:53PM +0000, Myklebust, Trond wrote:
> > On Thu, 2013-02-21 at 12:37 +0100, Ric Wheeler wrote:
> > > We have debated the need to have a system call to allow for offloading copy
> > > operations, for example to an NFS server (part to the new NFS 4.2
> > > specification), SCSI target device (two different SCSI commands do this), local
> > > file systems (reflink, etc) and I suspect many other possible parts of the stack
> > > could implement this.
> >
> > sendfile64() pretty much already has the right arguments for a
> > "copyfile", however it would be nice to add a 'flags' parameter: the
> > NFSv4.2 version would use that to specify whether or not to copy file
> > metadata.
>
> What would be really nice is if sendfile allowed zero-copy
> from network socket to a file descriptor. That would help
> a *lot* of my small system OEMs (and no splice() just doesn't
> cut it :-).
I've often wish the pipe requirement of splice() could be dropped,
to allow copying between arbitrary FDs. Perhaps this can be done?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists