linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/2] cpustat: use atomic operations to read/update stats

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 22 Feb 2013 15:23:05 +0100
From:	Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>
To:	Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
Cc:	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
	Kevin Hilman <khilman@...aro.org>,
	Russell King <rmk+kernel@....linux.org.uk>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
	linaro-kernel@...ts.linaro.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] cpustat: use atomic operations to read/update stats

On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 06:21:31AM -0800, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> On Fri, 2013-02-22 at 15:09 +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > On Fri, 2013-02-22 at 13:50 +0100, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> > > > Argh!! at what cost? 64bit atomics are like expensive. Wouldn't
> > > adding
> > > > a seqlock be saner?
> > > 
> > > Not sure. This requires a spinlock in the write side which is called
> > > from
> > > fast path like the timer interrupt.
> > 
> > A single spinlock is _way_ cheaper than a ton of cmpxchg8b()s to update
> > a few variables.
> 
> We also have include/linux/u64_stats_sync.h since 2.6.36

Interesting, we should probably use that instead.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/