[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1361543128.26780.65.camel@laptop>
Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2013 15:25:28 +0100
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
Cc: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
Kevin Hilman <khilman@...aro.org>,
Russell King <rmk+kernel@....linux.org.uk>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linaro-kernel@...ts.linaro.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] cpustat: use atomic operations to read/update stats
On Fri, 2013-02-22 at 15:16 +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > I checked arch/x86/include/asm/atomic64_32.h and we use
> > cmpxchg8b for everything from _set() to _read(), which
> > translates into 'horridly stupendifyingly slow' for a number
> > of machines, but coherent.
>
> That's a valid concern - and cmpxchg8b is the only 64-bit op
> available on most 32-bit x86 CPUs which does not involve the
> FPU.
>
> Wondering how significant this range of x86 problem boxes will
> be by the time any of these changes reaches upstream and distros
> - and how much 'horridly stupendifyingly slow' is in terms of
> cycles expended.
On the !x86 side of things we're implementing (generic) atomic64 using
hashed spinlocks, so there too using a single spinlock around the
entire data structure is a complete win.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists