lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.02.1302241437360.1943@hadrien>
Date:	Sun, 24 Feb 2013 14:39:45 +0100 (CET)
From:	Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@...6.fr>
To:	Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk>
cc:	Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@...6.fr>, ben-linux@...ff.org,
	kgene.kim@...sung.com, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
	linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org, heiko@...ech.de,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: question about arch/arm/mach-s3c24xx/irq.c

[Adding the person who introduced the code]

On Sun, 24 Feb 2013, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:

> On Sun, Feb 24, 2013 at 12:45:11PM +0100, Julia Lawall wrote:
> > The function s3c24xx_irq_map in arch/arm/mach-s3c24xx/irq.c contains the
> > code:
> >
> >                 parent_irq_data = &parent_intc->irqs[irq_data->parent_irq];
> > 		if (!irq_data) {
> >                         pr_err("irq-s3c24xx: no irq data found for hwirq %lu\n",
> >                                hw);
> >                         goto err;
> > 		}
> >
> > At this point irq_data has already been tested, so the null test on
> > irq_data does not look correct.  But I wonder if parent_irq_data could
> > ever be null here?
>
> That would be really obscure - because that would require parent_intc to
> be a "negative" pointer (to counter-act the indexing by
> irq_data->parent_irq).  So it looks to me like the above is redundant.

Even at its original definition irq_data seems unlikely to be NULL:

        struct s3c_irq_intc *intc = h->host_data;
	struct s3c_irq_data *irq_data = &intc->irqs[hw];
	...
	if (!irq_data) {
                pr_err("irq-s3c24xx: no irq data found for hwirq %lu\n", hw);
                return -EINVAL;
        }

That is, it could be an invalid value, but whether it actually hits 0
would seem to depend on the value hw?

Heiko, is NULL really a possibility?

thanks,
julia
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ