[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130227083213.aa234eea89272b09d6551f78@nvidia.com>
Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2013 08:32:13 +0200
From: Hiroshi Doyu <hdoyu@...dia.com>
To: Peter De Schrijver <pdeschrijver@...dia.com>
CC: "linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org" <linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
Mike Turquette <mturquette@...aro.org>,
Stephen Warren <swarren@...dia.com>,
"Prashant Gaikwad" <pgaikwad@...dia.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [REPOST PATCH 1/2] clk: add table lookup to mux
On Fri, 22 Feb 2013 16:02:28 +0100
Peter De Schrijver <pdeschrijver@...dia.com> wrote:
> Add a table lookup feature to the mux clock. Also allow arbitrary masks
> instead of the width. This will be used by some clocks on Tegra114.
>
> Signed-off-by: Peter De Schrijver <pdeschrijver@...dia.com>
....
> @@ -42,7 +43,17 @@ static u8 clk_mux_get_parent(struct clk_hw *hw)
> * val = 0x4 really means "bit 2, index starts at bit 0"
> */
....
> + if (mux->table) {
> + int i;
> +
> + for (i = 0; i < num_parents; i++)
> + if (mux->table[i] == val)
> + return i;
> + if (i == num_parents)
> + return -EINVAL;
> + }
Can't we just return after for-loop without checking i == num_parents as below?
+ for (i = 0; i < num_parents; i++) {
+ if (mux->table[i] == val)
+ return i;
+ }
+
+ return -EINVAL;
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists