linux-kernel - Re: [REPOST PATCH 0/2] Table lookup for mux clock type

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <51367625.2090405@wwwdotorg.org>
Date:	Tue, 05 Mar 2013 15:48:05 -0700
From:	Stephen Warren <swarren@...dotorg.org>
To:	Peter De Schrijver <pdeschrijver@...dia.com>
CC:	linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
	Mike Turquette <mturquette@...aro.org>,
	Stephen Warren <swarren@...dia.com>,
	Prashant Gaikwad <pgaikwad@...dia.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [REPOST PATCH 0/2] Table lookup for mux clock type

On 02/22/2013 08:02 AM, Peter De Schrijver wrote:
> This patchset adds a table lookup feature to the mux clock type. This will
> be used by the forthcoming Tegra114 clock implementation. Also instead of
> a fixed field width, a mask is used. This is because Tegra114 has some muxes
> where the parent selector is spread over several bitfields. The second patch
> adapts the tegra periph clock implementation which uses struct clk_mux
> directly.
> 
> --
> 
> Mike,
> 
> This patch is a dependency for the Tegra114 CCF implementation. Could you
> review it and merge on a topic branch so Stephen can pull it in to verify
> the integration?

Peter, does this repost you resolve the issue I pointed out at:
http://www.spinics.net/lists/arm-kernel/msg220873.html

To quote:

>>> Just a quick note on patch dependencies here:
>>>
>>> Patch 1/2 can presumably be taken through the clk tree whenever Mike is
>>> OK with it.
>>>
>>> Patch 2/2 depends on patches in the Tegra tree for 3.9. Since patch 2/2
>>> is useful mostly for the Tegra114 clock driver, and I don't imagine that
>>> will get posted/merged in time for 3.9, it's probably easiest to just
>>> take patch 2/2 for 3.10 along with the Tegra114 clock driver. Also, I
>>> imagine there won't be any more clk/Tegra tree dependencies in 3.10, so
>>> patch 2/2 and the Tegra114 clk driver patches can likely go through the
>>> clk tree itself for 3.10.
>> 
>> No. Because 1/2 changes struct clk_mux and the tegra peripheral clock type 
>> uses struct clk_mux directly, 2/2 needs to be applied together with 1/2, even
>> if the new functionality is not yet used.
> 
> Oh, then they can't be two separate patches then, or "git bisect" won't
> work. I guess it's best to wait for 3.10 for this:-(
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/