linux-kernel - Re: [GIT PULL] Load keys from signed PE binaries

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <loom.20130227T210924-53@post.gmane.org>
Date:	Wed, 27 Feb 2013 20:35:45 +0000 (UTC)
From:	ownssh <ownssh@...il.com>
To:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] Load keys from signed PE binaries

Matthew Garrett <mjg59 <at> srcf.ucam.org> writes:

> There's no way to update the UEFI key database without the update being 
> signed by an already trusted key, so what you're proposing isn't 
> possible.
> 

I confused.
Isn't custom mode can add user's own key?
> http://mjg59.dreamwidth.org/12368.html
> But I don't trust Microsoft
So I dont trust, I very worry MS will block the key they give in some day then
most fedora user need disable secure boot & update kernel and kmod signed
by that key.

I think secure boot should not control by MS, but if it's,
then it should not merge to linux kernel.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/