[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAPM=9twBA67kLADG4r51Q5me1AsLrHZeuTM4oSdkbKRmHGMtxA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 28 Feb 2013 07:31:57 +1000
From: Dave Airlie <airlied@...il.com>
To: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@....edu>, Peter Jones <pjones@...hat.com>,
Dave Airlie <airlied@...il.com>,
Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Matthew Garrett <mjg59@...f.ucam.org>,
David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>,
Florian Weimer <fw@...eb.enyo.de>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Josh Boyer <jwboyer@...hat.com>,
Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@...hat.com>,
Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>, keyrings@...ux-nfs.org,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] Load keys from signed PE binaries
On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 1:24 AM, Theodore Ts'o <tytso@....edu> wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 26, 2013 at 11:54:51AM -0500, Peter Jones wrote:
>> No, no, no. Quit saying nobody knows. We've got a pretty good idea -
>> we've got a contract with them, and it says they provide the signing
>> service, and under circumstances where the thing being signed is found
>> to enable malware that circumvents Secure Boot
>
> The question is what does "malware that circuments Secure Boot" mean?
> Does starting up a hacked KVM and running Windows 8 under KVM so that
> malare can be injected count as circumenting Secure Boot? If so, will
> you have to disable KVM, too?
>
> What if someone implements a virtualization bootkit for Windows 8.
> Will they revoke their own key? Somehow, I doubt that....
Have you noticed that laptops rarely come with virtualisation enabled
in the BIOS?
Now you know why.
Dave.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists