linux-kernel - Re: [RFC PATCH] sched: wakeup buddy

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1362046013.4460.195.camel@marge.simpson.net>
Date:	Thu, 28 Feb 2013 11:06:53 +0100
From:	Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>
To:	Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>
Cc:	Michael Wang <wangyun@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
	Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
	Paul Turner <pjt@...gle.com>, Alex Shi <alex.shi@...el.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Ram Pai <linuxram@...ibm.com>,
	"Nikunj A. Dadhania" <nikunj@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] sched: wakeup buddy

On Thu, 2013-02-28 at 18:25 +0900, Namhyung Kim wrote:

> Not sure if it should require bidirectional relationship.  Looks like
> just for benchmarks.  Isn't there a one-way relationship that could get
> a benefit from this?  I don't know ;-)

??  Meaningful relationships are bare minimum bidirectional, how can you
describe one connection and have it remain meaningful?  I love "her" is
unlikely to lead to anything meaningful if "she" doesn't know you exist.

-Mike

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/