[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1362065465.1758.15.camel@leonhard>
Date: Fri, 01 Mar 2013 00:31:05 +0900
From: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>
To: Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>
Cc: Michael Wang <wangyun@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
Paul Turner <pjt@...gle.com>, Alex Shi <alex.shi@...el.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Ram Pai <linuxram@...ibm.com>,
"Nikunj A. Dadhania" <nikunj@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] sched: wakeup buddy
2013-02-28 (목), 11:06 +0100, Mike Galbraith:
> On Thu, 2013-02-28 at 18:25 +0900, Namhyung Kim wrote:
>
> > Not sure if it should require bidirectional relationship. Looks like
> > just for benchmarks. Isn't there a one-way relationship that could get
> > a benefit from this? I don't know ;-)
>
> ?? Meaningful relationships are bare minimum bidirectional, how can you
> describe one connection and have it remain meaningful? I love "her" is
> unlikely to lead to anything meaningful if "she" doesn't know you exist.
Maybe I misunderstood something. I was thinking about typical
cooperation models like manager-worker, producer-consumer or pipeline
and thought that they are usually one-way relationship in terms of the
wakeup.
Thanks,
Namhyung
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists